° New expression : no change in title proper ° it is presented as an edition of the original work ° there is no indication there has been a major shift in focus » Do not use 'revision of' because that is an expression relationship ° Optionally, use relationship designators applicable to works (Appendix J.2) » authorized access point (7XX name/title field) » unstructured description in a note (500 field) ° adaptation or revision of the previous work and is presented as the work of the adapter/reviser (6.27.1.5) The creator has changed but the resource is presented as an adaptation or revision of the previous work: The creator is the same but a title change or other information indicates the resource has a very different scope of content or coverage ° anything in the MARC 245 field, 250 field, 300/‡a, or 4XX field differs from one bibliographic record to another.įrom Revised editions, Dave Reser, LC Policy & Standards Division, December 2011 New Work ° there is an explicit indication of changes (including corrections) of content ° a difference in the edition statement or the series whenever the item is a CIP book issued by the publisher in both a hardbound and a softbound version.Ĭonsider that a new edition is involved whenever: ° the addition, deletion, or change of an ISBN » A genuine name change, even if minor, should not be considered a variation ° a minor variation in an entity's name when a publisher uses multiple forms concurrently ° a difference in the printing or copyright date when there is also a publication date These guidelines LC practice/PCC practice followed to determine whether a resource is a copy of an earlier edition or it is a separate edition requiring a separate bibliographic record.Ĭonsider that the book is a copy if the only variation is one or more of the following: Note: this page was created with music cataloging in mind. Music Cataloging at Yale ♪ RDA Copy or new edition? (LC-PCC PS for 2.1) and Revised editions

New edition music